Hearing Status and Aural Rehabilitative Profile of 878 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine the hearing status and aural rehabilitative profile in a national cohort of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of Acoustic Neuroma Association members diagnosed with sporadic VS was performed from February 2017 through January 2019. Self-reported results were used to determine the aural rehabilitative profile of respondents. RESULTS: Among survey respondents, 62.2% (546/878) were not using any hearing-assistive device at time of survey. For the 37.8% (332/878) that were utilizing hearing-assistive devices, 32.8% (109/332) reported using a behind-the-ear hearing aid, 23.8% (79/332) used a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aid, and 21.7% (72/332) used a bone conduction device. Notably, 41.9% (278/663) of patients who previously underwent tumor treatment reported utilizing a hearing rehabilitation device at some point during VS management compared to 27.0% (58/215) of those undergoing observation with serial imaging (P < .001). Of 275 patients with functional hearing in the ipsilateral ear, 26.5% (73/275) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 24.0% (66/275) reported use of a conventional hearing aid, 0.7% (2/275) a CROS aid, and 0.4% (1/275) a bone conduction device. Among respondents reporting ipsilateral nonfunctional hearing, 44.9% (258/575) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 13.0% (75/575) a CROS aid, and 12.3% (71/575) a bone conduction device. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a cohort with presumably elevated literacy surrounding hearing rehabilitation options, few patients with a history of unilateral vestibular schwannoma ultimately use hearing assistive devices long-term, suggesting that most patients sufficiently adjust to unilateral hearing loss or are unsatisfied with the benefits achieved with current device options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1378-1381, 2021.

The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Perception and language results in infants with cochlear implantation under the age of 24 months.

OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.

Adoption, use and non-use of hearing aids: a robust estimate based on Welsh national survey statistics.

Objective: To report a robust measure of the proportion of adults who do not use their hearing aids.Design: Data on hearing aid use was extracted from national household survey data, from 2004 to 2018 in Wales, UK.Study sample: A representative sample of 10,000 to 16,000 adults per year.Results: Self-reported hearing difficulty increased smoothly from 14 to 16% during the 12 years when survey administration remained unchanged. The proportion reporting that they had tried a hearing aid increased from 5 to 7% and stabilised at this level since 2011. The proportion who reported using their hearing aid most of the time increased from 47 to 52% during the 15-year period. The proportion who did not use their hearing aids at all decreased from 21 to 18% over the same period.Conclusions: In this extensively-surveyed population, approximately 20% of adults currently do not use their hearing aids at all, 30% use them some of the time and the remaining 50% most of the time. Hearing aids are valued by many, as judged by use, but there is substantial room for improvement. Inclusion of questions on use within a large-scale, regular national survey enables the collection of demonstrably reliable data.

The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users.

Objective: To investigate the relation of a hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) with speech perception and noise tolerance measurements. It was hypothesised that speech intelligibility in noise and noise tolerance may explain a larger part of the variance in PROM scores than speech intelligibility in quiet.Design: This cross-sectional study used the Speech, Spatial, Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire as a PROM. Speech recognition in quiet, the Speech Reception Threshold in noise and noise tolerance as measured with the acceptable noise level (ANL) were measured with sentences.Study sample: A group of 48 unilateral post-lingual deafened cochlear implant (CI) users.Results: SSQ scores were moderately correlated with speech scores in quiet and noise, and also with ANLs. Speech scores in quiet and noise were strongly correlated. The combination of speech scores and ANL explained 10-30% of the variances in SSQ scores, with ANLs adding only 0-9%.Conclusions: The variance in the SSQ as hearing-specific PROM in CI users was not better explained by speech intelligibility in noise than by speech intelligibility in quiet, because of the remarkably strong correlation between both measures. ANLs made only a small contribution to explain the variance of the SSQ. ANLs seem to measure other aspects than the SSQ.

Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) for single patient cases: deriving statistical models from an expert-labelled data set.

Objective: Statistical knowledge about many patients could be exploited using machine learning to provide supporting information to otolaryngologists and other hearing health care professionals, but needs to be made accessible. The Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were recently introduced for the purpose of integrating data from different databases by providing an abstract representation of audiological measurements. This paper aims at collecting expert labels for a sample database and to determine statistical models from the labelled data set.Design: By an expert survey, CAFPAs as well as labels for audiological findings and treatment recommendations were collected for patients from the database of Hörzentrum Oldenburg.Study sample: A total of 287 single patient cases were assessed by twelve highly experienced audiological experts.Results: The labelled data set was used to derive probability density functions for categories given by the expert labels. The collected data set is suitable for estimating training distributions due to realistic variability contained in data for different, distinct categories. Suitable distribution functions were determined. The derived training distributions were compared regarding different audiological questions.Conclusions: The method-expert survey, sorting data into categories, and determining training distributions - could be extended to other data sets, which could then be integrated via the CAFPAs and used in a classification task.

Investigating the prevalence and impact of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use.

Objective: To explore the prevalence of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use, participants' help-seeking behaviours for these problems, and factors associated with hearing aid problems.Design: A prospective convenience cohort design surveying 413 adult hearing aid users (34-97 years of age) recruited from seven clinics across Australia.Results: Almost all participants (98%) indicated that they were experiencing at least one of the hearing aid problems included on the survey. The number of hearing aid related problems reported by participants ranged from 0 to 25 (of a possible 26), with a mean of 10 problems (SD = 5). The three most reported problems were related to difficulty hearing in noisy environments, hearing in windy environments, and understanding certain voices. Participants had reported less than half (46.33%) of the total problems identified to their clinic (range = 0-100%, mean = 43.40, SD = 13.92). Participants who reported experiencing a greater number of hearing aid problems also reported lower levels of hearing aid benefit, and satisfaction with their hearing aids.Conclusions: The majority of hearing aid owners experience problems with their hearing aids. Addressing these problems would likely contribute to improved hearing aid outcomes.

Global and regional needs, unmet needs and access to hearing aids.

Objectives: This article aims to estimate the global and regional needs, unmet needs and access to hearing aids, as well as the morbidity that can be averted by their use.Design: The study was based on Global Burden of Disease data. Study sample: Hearing impaired individuals "in need" of a hearing aid were defined as those in the moderate, moderately severe, and severe categories.Results: Globally, 401.4 million people are 'in need' of hearing aids. The large majority (83%) of them do not use hearing aids, with higher levels being in some regions such as the African region (90%). Accounting for hearing aid coverage reduced morbidity by 14.6% (95% UI 13.1- 16) - from 25 million YLDs to 21.3 million YLDs. It was estimated that if every single prevalent case in need would use a hearing aid, the burden of disease in this population would be reduced from the untreated 25 million YLDs to 10.3 million YLDs - a reduction of 59%.Conclusions: Development of innovative low-cost technologies with effective service delivery models, policy and regulatory changes to improve access, and combatting the stigma and lack of awareness are some of the potential solutions to improve access to hearing aids.

Audiologists' preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Background: There is little data available addressing how clinical audiologists handle cochlear implant (CI) programming between device manufacturers and make decisions on related services, particularly in the United States. Objectives: This study sought to understand the techniques and settings professionals use with their patients, how they approach bimodal fitting, which tests they use to evaluate patient and device performance, and their overall preferences of (re)habilitative options. Methods: A questionnaire was developed and distributed to CI audiologists throughout the United States electronically. Results: All respondents reported either always or almost always using Cochlear's default signal processing strategy in contrast to the 64% reported for Med-El and 40% for Advanced Bionics. A trend of less use of electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) than electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) for objective measures was revealed. Higher likelihood of performing speech recognition tests in quiet than in noise was revealed. Preferences for bimodal fitting trend toward using a partner company's hearing aid, although preferences were comparable in adopting four types of hearing aid formulas surveyed in the questionnaire. Conclusions: These data confirm high variability among audiologists' CI programming practices, and documenting these differences is an important step to understanding how to best treat patients.

Pediatric cochlear implant wear time and early language development.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze spoken language development in the first year of cochlear implant device use for pediatric recipients under five, and to determine the impact of device wear time on receptive and expressive spoken language outcomes using objective datalogging measures.Methods: Retrospective review of 37 children utilizing Cochlear™ processors capable of datalogging, who had completed speech and language testing before implantation and one year post. Hearing Hour Percentage (HHP) was created from datalogging results and two multiple regression analysis were performed including HHP and standard language scores.Results: HHP was found to be a predictor for receptive language outcomes one year after cochlear implant use. HHP was not found to be predictive of expressive language outcomes one year after cochlear implant use.Discussion: Datalogging is a vital objective measure that yields powerful data regarding a child's device use and early receptive spoken language development.Conclusion: In the first year of cochlear implant use, datalogging using the HHP significantly predicted receptive language scores. Increased HHP yielded higher receptive language standard scores. Continued research is needed to see if HHP is predictive of expressive language outcomes after a longer period of cochlear implant use.

Auditory Training for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Survey and Cost Analysis Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were as follows: (a) to describe audiologists' practices toward auditory training (AT) for adult cochlear implant (CI) users with a postlingual hearing loss; and (b) to assess the cost of different AT methods for clients and service providers in comparison with no AT delivery. DESIGN: A survey was distributed to approximately 230 Australian CI audiologists to investigate the range, magnitude, and rationale of AT practices adopted as part of rehabilitation services with adult CI users. The cost of these different AT practices was then estimated from the perspectives of both clients and service providers, and compared against no AT delivery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight audiologists responded to at least one section of the survey (16% to 33% response rate), of which 85.5% reported that they viewed AT as a necessary component of rehabilitation. Home-based and face-to-face were the methods most frequently adopted to deliver AT. Methods used during training, such as stimuli type, feedback, and encouragement for training adherence, varied across respondents. The cost analysis indicated that home-based training resulted in the lowest program costs, whereas face-to-face AT (when delivered independently from routine appointments) was the method with highest cost for clients and service providers. CONCLUSIONS: The type of AT, recommended frequency of sessions, and overall duration of programs varied widely across respondents. Costs incurred by clients depended mainly on whether the AT was home-based or clinician-led (i.e., face-to-face, group-based), program fees, and travel arrangements made by clients, as well as clinicians' wages and the method chosen to deliver AT.

The Circle of Care for Older Adults With Hearing Loss and Comorbidities: A Case Study of a Geriatric Audiology Clinic.

Purpose Older adults seeking audiologic rehabilitation often present with medical comorbidities, yet these realities of practice are poorly understood. Study aims were to examine (a) the frequency of identification of selected comorbidities in clients of a geriatric audiology clinic, (b) the influence of comorbidities on audiology practice, and (c) the effect of comorbidities on rehabilitation outcomes. Method The records of 135 clients ( M age = 86 years) were examined. Information about comorbidities came from audiology charts (physical paper files) and hospital electronic health records (EHRs). Data about rehabilitation recommendations and outcomes came from the charts. Focus groups with audiologists probed their views of how comorbidities influenced their practice. Results The frequency of identification was 68% for visual, 50% for cognitive, and 42% for manual dexterity issues; 84% had more than one comorbidity. Also noted were hypertension (43%), falls (33%), diabetes (13%), and depression (16%). Integrating information from the audiology chart and EHR provided a more complete understanding of comorbidities. Information about hearing in the EHR included logs of outpatient audiology visits (75% of 135 cases), audiologists' care notes for inpatients and long-term care residents (25%), and entries by other health professionals (60%). Modifications to audiology practice were common and varied depending on comorbidity. High rates of success were achieved regardless of comorbidities. Conclusions In this clinic, successful outcomes were achieved by modifying audiology practice for clients with comorbidities. Increased interprofessional communication among clinicians in the circle of care could improve care planning and outcomes for older adults with hearing loss.

Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs): statistical and compact representation of rehabilitative audiological classification based on expert knowledge.

OBJECTIVE: As a step towards objectifying audiological rehabilitation and providing comparability between different test batteries and clinics, the Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were introduced as a common and abstract representation of audiological knowledge obtained from diagnostic tests. DESIGN: Relationships between CAFPAs as an intermediate representation between diagnostic tests and audiological findings, diagnoses and treatment recommendations (summarised as "diagnostic cases") were established by means of an expert survey. Expert knowledge was collected for 14 given categories covering different diagnostic cases. For each case, the experts were asked to indicate expected ranges of diagnostic test outcomes, as well as traffic light-encoded CAFPAs. STUDY SAMPLE: Eleven German experts in the field of audiological rehabilitation from Hanover and Oldenburg participated in the survey. RESULTS: Audiological findings or treatment recommendations could be distinguished by a statistical model derived from the experts' answers for CAFPAs as well as audiological tests. CONCLUSIONS: The CAFPAs serve as an abstract, comprehensive representation of audiological knowledge. If more detailed information on certain functional aspects of the auditory system is required, the CAFPAs indicate which information is missing. The statistical graphical representations for CAFPAs and audiological tests are suitable for audiological teaching material; they are universally applicable for real clinical databases.

Severe-to-profound hearing impairment: demographic data, gender differences and benefits of audiological rehabilitation.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify and report demographic data of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss, assess participation in audiological rehabilitation and analyze the benefits of various rehabilitation methods.Materials and methods: Data on 4286 patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairments registered in the Swedish Quality Register of Otorhinolaryngology over a period from 2006-2015 were studied. Demographic data, gender differences, audiological rehabilitation and benefits of the rehabilitation were analyzed.Results: Group rehabilitation and visits to a hearing rehabilitation educator provided the most benefits in audiological rehabilitation. Only 40.5% of the patients received extended audiological rehabilitation, of which 54.5% were women. A total of 9.5% of patients participated in group rehabilitation, with 59.5% being women. Women also visited technicians, welfare officers, hearing rehabilitation educators, psychologists and physicians and received communication rehabilitation in a group and fit with cochlea implants significantly more often than did men.Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of being given the opportunity to participate in group rehabilitation and meet a hearing rehabilitation educator to experience the benefits of hearing rehabilitation. There is a need to offer extended audiological rehabilitation, especially in terms of gender differences, to provide the same impact for women and men.Implications for RehabilitationSignificantly more women than men with severe-to-profound hearing impairment receive audiological rehabilitation.Hearing impairment appears to have a significantly more negative impact on women's quality of life than men's.It is important to offer extended audiological rehabilitation to all patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss to obtain an equal hearing health care regardless of gender.

Hearing Restoration with Cochlear Implantation in Patients Deafened after Blunt Head Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients deafened following blunt head trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case series review of seven patients post-lingually deafened following blunt head trauma and aided with cochlear implants. The following data were analyzed: Cause of injury, computed tomography results, surgical information, intra- and post-implantation complications, audiometric and speech perception assessment, processor mapping, and data from follow-up appointments. RESULTS: The median age of patients at the time of cochlear implantation was 29 years. The median time elapsed between head trauma and cochlear implantation was 5.77 months (minimum 0.8 and maximum 6.73 months). The median post-implantation follow-up time was 11.97 years. No facial nerve stimulation was observed in any case. All patients significantly improved their audiology and speech perception performances within a short time following cochlear implantation and CI performance did not decrease with long-term follow-up in any case. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for patients deafened following blunt head trauma.

Service Provision for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing at Preschool and Elementary School Ages.

Purpose: To characterize preschool and school services for children who are hard of hearing (CHH), we described service setting, amount, and configuration and analyzed the relationship between service receipt and student hearing levels and language scores. Characteristics of professionals providing services were described and then used to predict level of comfort with skills supporting listening and spoken language. The amount of provider communication with children's audiologists was also investigated. Method: Participants included parents of CHH (preschool n = 174; school n = 155) and professionals (preschool n = 133; school n = 104) who completed interviews and questionnaires as part of a longitudinal study. Children's hearing, speech, and language data were collected from annual testing and analyzed in relation to service data. Results: A majority (81%) of preschool-age CHH received services. Children were more likely to be in a preschool for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (CDHH) or exceptional children than a general education preschool. By elementary school, 70% received services, nearly all in general education settings. Sessions averaged twice a week for a total of approximately 90 min. Children who no longer received services performed significantly better on speech/language measures than those who received services, regardless of service setting. Professionals were primarily speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and teachers of CDHH. SLPs reported significantly less comfort with skills involving auditory development and hearing technologies and less frequent communication with the child's audiologists than teachers of CDHH. Overall communication with audiologists was more frequent in the preschool years. Conclusions: As preschool-age CHH transition into school, the majority continue to qualify for services. Congruent with national trends, school-age CHH in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study were most often in general education settings. Without specialized preprofessional or postgraduate training, SLPs and teachers of CDHH did not report comfort with all the skills critical to developing listening and spoken language. This finding supports the need for increased implementation of interprofessional practice among SLPs and teachers of CDHH, as well as audiologists, to best meet the needs unique to this population.

La importancia del comienzo temprano del tratamiento con corticoide intratimpánico en hipoacusia súbita / The importance of early treatment with intratympanic corticoid for sudden hypoacusia / A importância do começo temporão do tratamento com corticoide intratimpánico em hipoacusia subita

INTRODUCCIÓN: La hipoacusia neurosensorial súbita idiopática se define como la pérdida de audición súbita, de más de 30 dB, en por lo menos 3 frecuencias contiguas de la audiometría tonal, que ocurre dentro de los 3 días de inicio del síntoma, en un paciente sin antecedentes otológicos previos. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la relación entre el comienzo temprano del tratamiento con corticoide intratimpánico y el grado de recuperación auditiva. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Es un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo. A través de una revisión de historias clínicas se recolectaron pacientes con diagnóstico de hipoacusia neurosensorial súbita, valorados entre 2016 y 2017. El protocolo terapéutico utilizado fue la inyección de corticoide intratimpánico bajo visión microscópica, del oído afectado. Este procedimiento se realizó una vez por semana, durante 4 semanas. Se solicitó un control audiométrico una vez finalizado el tratamiento para evaluar el grado de recuperación auditiva...

INTRODUCTION: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss surdez neurosensorial subita is defined as a sudden loss of hearing, of more than 30dB, in at least three adjacent frequencies of the tone audiometry, which occurs within the three days after the symptom onset, in patients without previous otologic background. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the relationship between the early beginning of treatment with intratympanic corticoid and the degree of hearing recovery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is an observational, descriptive and retrospective study. Medical records of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss diagnosis between 2016 and 2017 were gathered. The therapeutic protocol used was injection of intratympanic corticoid in the affected ear under microscopic vision. This procedure was carried out once a week, for 4 weeks. An audiometric control was done after finishing treatment in order to assess the hearing recovery degree…

INTRODUÇÃO: A surdez neurosensorial subita idiopatica define-se como a perda de audição subita, a mais de 30dB, em pelo menos 3 frequências contíguas da audiometria tonal, que ocorre dentro dos 3 dias de início do sintoma, num paciente sem antecedentes otológicos prévios. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a relação entre o começo temporão do tratamento com corticoide intratimpánico e o grau de recuperação auditiva. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: É um estudo observacional, descritivo e retrospectivo. Através de uma revisão de histórias clínicas colectaram-se pacientes com diagnóstico de hipoacusia neurosensorial súbita, avaliados entre 2016 e 2017. O protocolo terapêutico utilizado foi a injeção de corticoide intratimpánico baixo visão microscópica, do ouvido afectado. Este procedimento realizou-se uma vez por semana, durante 4 semanas. Solicitou-se um controle audiométrico uma vez finalizado o tratamento para avaliar o grau de recuperação auditiva...

[Employed with a hearing impairment in Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia : Regional results of the GINKO study]. / Erwerbstätig mit Hörschädigung in Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Thüringen : Regionale Ergebnisse aus der GINKO-Studie.

BACKGROUND: Hearing impairments and hearing loss cause deficits in communication ability and represent relevant participation restrictions according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). In order to counteract these participation restrictions, particularly in the workplace, several acts have been passed in Germany including SGB IX and UN-BRK. OBJECTIVE: The implementation of these laws in the federal states Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia is presented from the perspective of hearing-impaired employees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the GINKO study, conducted in cooperation with self-help organizations, a standardized written questionnaire with items about the workplace was administered to employed persons with hearing impairments. The questionnaire was also available online with sign language. Overall, 3189 severely disabled hearing-impaired working persons responded to the GINKO survey, of whom n = 260 (8.3 %) were from Saxony, n = 53 (1.7 %) from Saxony-Anhalt, and n = 62 (1.9 %) from Thuringia. RESULTS: The majority of participants reported that they did not (yet) have an accessible workplace and that assistive services were not available to all hearing-impaired employees. This was true overall and in the three individual states. There are still considerable deficits in the implementation of legally required possibilities. No statistically significant differences exist between the three federal states in terms of utilization of legally required assistive services in the workplace or the accessibility of the workplace to hearing-impaired employees. CONCLUSION: Causes for this might be found in insufficient information regarding legal possibilities available to hearing-impaired employees. Therefore, information about state-wide self-help organizations is important to encourage participation in working life in accordance with ICF after successful medical treatment.

[Inpatient rehabilitation of adult CI users: Results in dependency of duration of deafness, CI experience and age]. / Stationäre Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen bei erwachsenen CI-Trägern: Ergebnisse in Abhängigkeit von der Dauer der Taubheit, Nutzungsdauer und Alter.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CI) have proven to be a highly effective treatment for severe hearing loss or deafness. Inpatient rehabilitation therapy is frequently discussed as a means to increase the speech perception abilities achieved by CI. However, thus far there exists no quantitative evaluation of the effect of these therapies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of audiometric data obtained from 1355 CI users compared standardized and qualitative speech intelligibility tests conducted at two time points (admission to and discharge from inpatient hearing therapy, duration 3-5 weeks). The test battery comprised examination of vowel/consonant identification, the Freiburg numbers and monosyllabic test (65 and 80 dB sound pressure level, SPL, free-field sound level), the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) sentence test in quiet and in noise (65 dB SPL speech level; 15 dB signal-to-noise ratio, SNR), and a speech tracking test with and without lip-reading. RESULTS: An average increase of 20 percentage points was scored at discharge compared to the admission tests. Patients of all ages and duration of deafness demonstrated the same amount of benefit from the rehabilitation treatment. After completion of inpatient rehabilitation treatment, patients with short duration of CI experience (below 4 months) achieved test scores comparable to experienced long-term users. The demonstrated benefit of the treatment was independent of age and duration of deafness or CI experience. CONCLUSION: The rehabilitative training program significantly improved hearing abilities and speech perception in CI users, thus promoting their professional and social inclusion. The present results support the efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for CI recipients. Integration of this or similar therapeutic concepts in the German catalog of follow-up treatment measures appears justified.

Hearing aid and cochlear implant use in children with hearing loss at three years of age: Predictors of use and predictors of changes in use.

OBJECTIVE: To examine usage patterns of hearing aids and cochlear implants in children up to three years of age, how usage changes longitudinally, and factors associated with device usage. DESIGN: Parent report and Parent's Evaluation of Aural/oral Performance of Children (PEACH) data were obtained at six and twelve months after hearing-aid fitting or cochlear implant switch-on, and again at three years of age. The effect of device use on auditory functional performance was investigated using the PEACH questionnaire. STUDY SAMPLE: Four hundred and thirteen participants from the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment (LOCHI) study were included for analysis. RESULTS: For users of hearing aids, higher usage at three years was associated with higher maternal education, and more severe hearing loss. For users of cochlear implants, higher usage was associated with higher maternal education and the absence of additional disabilities. Higher PEACH scores were associated with higher usage scores. After allowing for the effects of demographic characteristics, device use was not a significant predictor of functional performance. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-two percent of children achieved consistent use (> 75% of waking hours) within the first year of receiving a hearing aid or a cochlear implant, and 71% by three years of age.

Prediction of the use of conventional hearing aids in Korean adults with unilateral hearing impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of a hearing aid at six months post-fitting and to evaluate the predictors of its ongoing use in Korean adults with unilateral hearing impairment (HI). DESIGN: Retrospective study at a secondary referral hospital over a 15-year period. STUDY SAMPLE: This study analysed 119 adults with unilateral HI who had been recommended for hearing amplification (55 men and 64 women, mean age, 58.0 ± 11.7 years). Six months after the fitting, all of the participants were surveyed regarding subsequent decisions and actions about obtaining hearing aids. RESULTS: General uptake rate for a hearing aid was 68.1% (58.0% of participants surveyed were successful users, and 10.1% were intermittent users). The most significant parameter associated with hearing-aid use was social and/or work activities (R(2) = 0.457), and the significant predictors for successful hearing-aid use were social and/or work activities and method of signal processing (discriminatory power = 56.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Six months post-fitting, 68.1% of Korean adults with unilateral HI who had agreed to try a hearing aid continued to use it regularly. The predictors for hearing-aid use six months post-fitting included social and/or work activities and digital signal processing.